Best Solar Companies in Singapore (2026): An Independently Verified Comparison
Every other list like this is published by a company that ranks itself in it. This one can't, because we don't install. Here is the methodology, applied the same way to every company on it, including the one we work with.
Quick answer
This comparison checks Singapore solar installers against three verifiable facts: BCA licensing status, years operating, and Google review volume and rating. No installation-quality score, since that can't be verified without inspecting completed work, and no composite ranking, since a manufactured number is what makes most lists like this hard to trust. Sunnify is not on this list; we don't install. Partners are included under the same criteria as everyone else.
0
Solar installers on this list that also appear ranking themselves in their own comparably-titled article, because Sunnify does not install and is not on the list at all
Every other list titled something like this is published by a company that ranks itself in it. GetSolar's own methodology note for its comparable article admits scoring itself alongside its competitors.
Sunnify cannot do that, because we don't hold BCA ME03 and don't install. This list is what that constraint makes possible: a comparison with no installer's own company anywhere in it, including any we work with.
What's the methodology behind this list?
Three criteria, applied the same way to every company, checked against public sources rather than each company's own marketing claims wherever an independent source existed: BCA licensing status, years the company has operated, and independent Google review volume and rating. Each entry states plainly what was independently verified, what came from a single source, and what could not be confirmed at all.
This list is not a ranking of installation quality, which cannot be assessed without physically inspecting completed work, and it is not a composite score, for reasons covered below. It is a comparison of the facts that can actually be checked, presented so a reader can verify them independently rather than trust a number.
Why isn't there an overall score?
A single number out of ten, or a star rating built from weighted criteria a reader never sees the weighting of, invites more trust than it has earned. Reasonable installers, weighted differently, could top or bottom the same list depending entirely on choices made before a single fact was gathered, and a reader has no way to check that from the outside.
Showing the underlying facts instead lets a reader weigh what matters most to them, licensing status, years operating, review data, rather than accepting someone else's weighting dressed up as an objective score.
How were these companies chosen and ordered?
Ordered by years operating, the one criterion here that's both objectively verifiable and genuinely difficult to fake. Each date is the most defensible one found: an official company registration record where one exists, a self-reported figure where it does not.
Fourteen companies, and a pattern worth stating plainly before the list itself: founding-year claims turned out to be genuinely inconsistent for several of them, sometimes within a single company's own materials. Where that happened, both figures are stated rather than one being quietly picked.
UTICA
States operating since 2004, a single-source figure from the company's own materials that could not be cross-verified against an independent company registration record in this pass. Registered with BCA, specific grade not confirmed. Independent Google review data was not found.
PMCE
PMCE (Global) Pte Ltd was incorporated 27 July 2006, confirmed via Singapore company registration records rather than the company's own claim. A 4.9-star Google rating was found, though not cross-confirmed across multiple listings the way Solargy's figure was. States over 1,000 completed projects and a BCA reference, specific grade not confirmed.
Solargy
Operating since 2007, close to two decades in the Singapore solar market. Registered with BCA under ME03 (L6), MEO5 (L2) and CR16 (L1). 5.0 stars across 112 Google reviews, independently confirmed across three separate sources rather than taken from a single listing. Focuses on residential work: HDB flats under SolarNova, landed properties, and private condominiums.
Energetix
States operating since 1996 with three decades of engineering experience, a notably different figure from Energetix Pte Ltd's own company registration record, incorporated 5 August 2015. Both figures are real facts about different things, an operating history versus a specific legal entity's age, worth asking the company to explain directly rather than assuming either number in isolation.
Registered with BCA. Independent Google review data was not found.
Eigen Energy
Incorporated 8 July 2015 per company registration records, registered with BCA under ME03 (Level 4) and ME05 (Level 2). States over 80 completed projects and pairs residential work with a commercial portfolio including several well-known corporate clients, worth noting for a reader specifically comparing residential-focused specialists.
Independent Google review data was not found.
aKanDo Solutions
Operating since 2017, confirmed in the BCA directory as an L1-grade company under ME03. Google rating found consistently above 4.5, though the exact review count could not be confirmed in this pass, serving both residential and commercial projects.
LHN Energy
States operating in solar since 2018, under LHN Energy Resources Pte Ltd, listed in the BCA directory. Customer testimonials describing professional, well-communicated installations were found, but a specific aggregate Google rating or review count could not be confirmed independently. Also offers EV charger installation.
Union Energy
Two different figures for the same company: one source states more than 40 years as a trusted energy brand, another describes a 32-year growth journey. Achieved BCA Grade L4 under ME03 within what the company's own materials describe as five months.
Union Power, its electricity retail arm, is EMA-licensed and states more than 20,000 households and businesses served. Independent Google review data specific to the solar installation service was not found.
Rezeca Renewables
States 17 years operating and more than 1,300 completed residential installations, figures drawn from the company's own materials that could not be independently cross-verified through a third-party source in this pass. States an in-house installation team with no subcontractors. BCA licensing status and independent review data were not confirmed through a source separate from the company's own site.
FOMO Energy
Sources disagree on founding year: one states 2021, another references the company's origins in 2002, and neither could be independently confirmed against a company registration record in this pass. States over 190 installations and a partnership with Senoko Energy, an established Singapore electricity retailer.
BCA licensing status was not confirmed independently; the company's own materials describe managing regulatory approvals rather than stating direct licensure.
GetSolar
Operating since 2020, formerly Solar AI Technologies, backed by ENGIE. An important open question this research could not resolve: whether GetSolar itself holds BCA ME03 licensing, or operates more as a platform connecting homeowners to licensed installation partners.
The company's own materials describe managing LEW and EMA compliance on a customer's behalf, rather than stating direct BCA licensure plainly. Worth asking directly rather than assuming either structure.
GenesisSolar
Incorporated November 2020 per Singapore company registration records, roughly five to six years operating as of this comparison. Registered with BCA, though the specific licence grade was not independently confirmed in this pass, and independent Google review data was not found.
Sunnify currently partners with GenesisSolar for installation work. The criteria above were applied identically regardless of that relationship, with no additional weight or label given for it.
Energio
A boutique installer, by its own description founded by a homeowner who built a personal system before installing for others: a specific origin story, not a vague one. The actual founding year isn't stated anywhere found in this pass, though.
Holds a BCA reference and states every project is signed off by a Licensed Electrical Worker. Independent Google review data was not found.
Sunollo
4.9 stars from 50-plus Google reviews, states BCA-licensed installer status. Worth noting plainly: the company's current UEN suggests incorporation in 2023, notably more recent than the scale of its published content and stated customer numbers might suggest. That's not necessarily a red flag on its own, since business entities restructure and rebrand for many ordinary reasons.
It's worth asking about directly, though, given the gap between entity age and claimed scale.
What this list does not tell you
It does not tell you which installer will do the best job on your specific roof, since workmanship quality genuinely varies by crew and by project, not just by company. It does not tell you which quote will be cheapest, since pricing depends on system size and roof specifics far more than on which company you choose. It does not substitute for the direct questions worth asking any installer before signing, covered in the full buyer's checklist.
How this list gets updated
Facts here were checked against public sources on 1 September 2026 and will be re-verified and updated periodically rather than left static, with changes noted rather than silently edited. Where a fact could not be independently verified, that gap is stated rather than filled with an assumption, and readers are encouraged to verify directly with any company before making a decision based on anything here.
Run the Sunnify solar estimate to get your own roof properly assessed, independent of which installer you eventually choose.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
We're an advisor, not an installer, so the licensing and years-operating criteria used here don't even apply to us the same way. All installations we advise on are carried out by partnered, independently BCA-licensed contractors. Staying out of our own comparison entirely is the simplest way to avoid the exact credibility problem this article is trying to solve.
The same methodology applies to every company here regardless of any relationship with Sunnify. Labelling partners specially would invite exactly the bias concern this list exists to avoid; the criteria and the underlying facts are what should do the work, not a badge.
A composite score out of some number looks precise but hides the judgment calls behind how it was weighted, and it is trivially easy to construct a score that produces whatever ranking order was wanted going in. Showing the underlying facts, verifiable independently by anyone, is harder to game and more useful than a number asking to be trusted on faith.
Not necessarily, but it is one of the few facts about a company that is both objectively verifiable and difficult to fake, unlike a review count or a claimed customer number. Treat it as one input among several, not a conclusion on its own, and use it alongside licensing status and review data rather than instead of them.
Because that is genuinely what the available sources say, and picking one to present as the answer would mean hiding a real inconsistency rather than resolving it. A company's marketed operating history and its current legal entity's registration date can differ for entirely ordinary reasons, a rebrand, a restructuring, a new holding entity, but a reader deciding who to trust deserves to see both figures and ask, not a single smoothed-over number.
More for you
